Peer reviews are handed out closest to a decision first
Functions waiting for their 4th and 5th confirmation never came up while hundreds waited in peer review, so nothing was ever auto-accepted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
This commit is contained in:
parent
ac0ead9db4
commit
ced71caa75
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -42,7 +42,11 @@ export class PeerReviews {
|
|||
return (this.project.matchPolicy.peerLeaseMinutes ?? 60) * 60_000;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Attempts waiting for peer review that `user` may take. */
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Attempts waiting for peer review that `user` may take, closest to a decision first: a function
|
||||
* one verdict short of acceptance (or of going back) beats one nobody has looked at yet, so
|
||||
* decisions get finished instead of verdicts spread thinly over the whole queue.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
available(user, limit = 20) {
|
||||
return this.store.all(
|
||||
`SELECT a.id AS attempt_id, a.batch_id, a.task_id, a.state, t.symbol_id, s.name, a.finished_at,
|
||||
|
|
@ -53,7 +57,7 @@ export class PeerReviews {
|
|||
WHERE a.state IN ('peer_review', 'in_review') AND a.user_id != ?
|
||||
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM users b WHERE b.id = ? AND b.peer_review_blocked = 1)
|
||||
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM peer_reviews p WHERE p.attempt_id = a.id AND p.reviewer_id = ?)
|
||||
ORDER BY a.state = 'in_review', a.finished_at
|
||||
ORDER BY MAX(confirmations, objections) DESC, a.finished_at
|
||||
LIMIT ?`,
|
||||
now(),
|
||||
user.id,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue