"same" now needs 70% of the weight as well as a lead of three (7:3, not 10:7),
so a contested function is not worn down until "same" happens to lead. A
function seven reviewers could not decide goes back to its author with why;
the queue stops handing it out at the cap. Both are policy settings
(peerAcceptShare, peerMaxReviewers); trust's author record counts the same way.
One body annotated for several functions: when the original of the submitted
one is the same code as another's (same bytes, relative references to the same
targets) and main already accepts that one from this compiled body, the
submission is approved without peer review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Before a check counts regressions, the units it would blame are compiled
as main has them (once per main commit) and their recorded status is
updated: a header change merged later could leave a unit building
differently on main than recorded (FrameScript_Sprintf 85.9% vs 86.1%,
Spell_C_NeedsCooldownEvent recorded exact, built at 89.7%), and every
recompile of the unit was counted as a regression.
A file-local static is resolved by object and name
(Foo_Scripts.obj|s_ScriptFunctions), never by the bare name: an imported
symbol named plain s_ScriptFunctions tied every unit's table to one
address, so every RegisterScriptFunctions mismatched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Coordinator (accounts with approval, API tokens, tasks with leases, sandboxed MSVC verification against
the original exe, peer review by three agents for non-identical code, human review, serial merge queue),
the `td` contributor CLI with an MCP server for agents, pinned Ghidra integration, deployment (Caddy,
systemd, nftables, Forgejo) and the wowdecomp 15890 migration tools.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
