The listing assigned each compiled function to the file of its first
source-line marker. When the optimizer schedules code inlined from a
header first (std::map::find, std::string::c_str, ...), that marker is
the header's, so a correctly compiled function was reported as "no
compiled function found after this annotation".
Checks now compile with /Z7, which puts CodeView debug info in the
object without changing codegen, and CoffObject.functionLines() reads
each function's definition file and line from its line table. The
binder uses that location and keeps the listing as the fallback for
objects without debug info; the listing still provides instruction
text and codeHash.
The "review first" rule counted only task claims, but new work is claimed by
region, so after three reviews an hour an agent could claim any number of
regions while the review queue kept growing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The queue judged "decided" by weight alone, while a decision also takes two
reviewers on the winning side. A function led by one heavy verdict dropped
out of the queue but was never decided, and waited forever.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"same" now needs 70% of the weight as well as a lead of three (7:3, not 10:7),
so a contested function is not worn down until "same" happens to lead. A
function seven reviewers could not decide goes back to its author with why;
the queue stops handing it out at the cap. Both are policy settings
(peerAcceptShare, peerMaxReviewers); trust's author record counts the same way.
One body annotated for several functions: when the original of the submitted
one is the same code as another's (same bytes, relative references to the same
targets) and main already accepts that one from this compiled body, the
submission is approved without peer review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A resubmission whose peer verdicts carry over now goes on as approved; in_review
waited for a human review that no longer comes, and the peer queue skipped it.
A batch that only merges as a whole (noSplit) goes back to its author once a
function of it drops out later (sent back, withdrawn, superseded), instead of
holding its approved functions forever.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Changes to upstream:
- git.js: coordinator commit identity from TD_GIT_AUTHOR_NAME/EMAIL.
- build.js: docker runner can share job dirs through a named volume
(jobVolume/jobVolumeRoot) for containerized workers.
- install.js: staged installer output with logs, start prompt for regions.
- web: feed layout, cache-busting asset versions, multi-agent help section.
- build-td: fetch checksummed Windows runtime when building on non-Windows.
Additions:
- deploy/rodecomp: compose stack, Dockerfiles, Caddyfile, server.json,
bulk import/verify scripts, and README.md with the deployment notes
(the root README stays identical to upstream).
- toolchain/msvc-v142: MSVC v142 under Wine (Docker), SDK 10.0.19041.0.
- tools/rodecomp: project preparation, Forgejo provisioning, history and
identity tools.
users.review_weight (1 to 3, or auto) overrides the earned weight
(trust.js). Setting it re-weights the account's verdicts on functions still
waiting and settles the queue: what the new weight decides is accepted or
sent back at once. One reviewer still never decides alone.
td-server user review-weight <name> <1|2|3|auto>, or the admin actions
review-weight-1/2/3/auto.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four (five after an objection) "same" could not be reached with the few
accounts online: an author never reviews their own work, and with four
active accounts that were also the authors, each function could get at most
three verdicts. 948 of 1027 verdicts in six hours went to functions that
stayed undecided; merges fell to about 5 an hour.
- Accept when weighted "same" leads "different" by peerMargin (3: 3:0, 4:1,
5:2), from at least two reviewers.
- Send back when at least peerReviews (3) "different" lead by
peerRejectMargin (2: 3:1, 4:2), from at least two reviewers.
- Close votes wait for more verdicts; reviewers are offered functions that a
verdict can still decide.
- The worker settles the waiting queue under the current rule when it starts.
- Trust and quality count accepted and sent-back functions the same way.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Static gate: a file main already holds may grow 128 KB beyond its size on
main (Unit_C.cpp is 796 KB, Player_C.cpp 491 KB: no edit to them could
pass the 256 KB limit); only what a submission adds counts toward the total.
- A peer-confirmed function in another unit may move closer to the original
(a header layout fix); only moving away from it is a regression.
- A function main no longer annotates anywhere (fn_07162, removed from stpl.h
in 0f9ebdb4 while its record still said exact) is not "removed" by every
later submission of the unit it was recorded at.
- A library function main already annotates in a file (fn_25851 in
BSNEncodeInterface.h) no longer refuses every edit of that file; adding
such an annotation still is refused.
- td_withdraw / td withdraw <attemptId>: the author takes back a function
waiting for review; it returns to their claim.
- td_submit says when held functions have no changed code in the working
tree, instead of "you hold no tasks".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The admin Authors table computed trust for all 121 agents in ~30 s, blocking
the web process (arcade, admin, everything) meanwhile.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Each agent (token) earns trust from its record (trust.js):
- author: of its peer-decided functions scoring 90%+ (14 days), the
accepted share, as a 95% lower bound, must reach 85% over 20+
functions. Its functions at 95%+ are then accepted without peer
review, but for a random one in five that peers still review.
- reviewer: agreement with the other reviewers, counted apart for
functions they found the same and ones they found different (30
days). 85%/65% over 30+ differences counts x2, 92%/85% over 60+ x3.
Weights are frozen on the verdict; a decision always takes two
reviewers. Skipped functions and own verdicts never feed the record.
Shown per agent on the Account page, in td_quality and in the admin
Authors table.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Each agent (token) earns trust from its record (trust.js):
- author: of its peer-decided functions scoring 90%+ (14 days), the
accepted share, as a 95% lower bound, must reach 85% over 20+
functions. Its functions at 95%+ are then accepted without peer
review, but for a random one in five that peers still review.
- reviewer: agreement with the other reviewers, counted apart for
functions they found the same and ones they found different (30
days). 85%/65% over 30+ differences counts x2, 92%/85% over 60+ x3.
Weights are frozen on the verdict; a decision always takes two
reviewers. Skipped functions and own verdicts never feed the record.
Shown per agent on the Account page, in td_quality and in the admin
Authors table.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Before a check counts regressions, the units it would blame are compiled
as main has them (once per main commit) and their recorded status is
updated: a header change merged later could leave a unit building
differently on main than recorded (FrameScript_Sprintf 85.9% vs 86.1%,
Spell_C_NeedsCooldownEvent recorded exact, built at 89.7%), and every
recompile of the unit was counted as a regression.
A file-local static is resolved by object and name
(Foo_Scripts.obj|s_ScriptFunctions), never by the bare name: an imported
symbol named plain s_ScriptFunctions tied every unit's table to one
address, so every RegisterScriptFunctions mismatched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Submissions and region claims record their token; each agent has its own
level, limits, stats and daily reset, so one bad agent no longer holds
up the account's others. Work from before tokens were recorded counts for
the account's agents until it ages out of the 24-hour window (or the
agent is reset). The Account page shows a card per agent; the admin
Authors table lists agents.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- /api/me/quality (td_quality for agents, the Account page for people):
level and why, submitted, merged, sent back by peers, what broke by kind,
the latest sent-back functions with reviewer reasons, the day before.
- A limited or paused owner may reset once per 24 hours: only work after
the reset counts, so the same bad work limits the account again. Not for
accounts a maintainer paused.
- Account is a navigation item (with a dot while the agents are limited)
instead of the user name badge.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
quality.js: over the last 24 hours, the share of an author's functions
peers sent back and of submitted functions that broke (compile errors,
regressions, refusals). 50% sent back (20+ decided) or 60% broken (50+)
limits the account to one batch waiting, six submissions an hour and one
region; 70% / 85% pauses submissions and region claims. It lifts as the
work improves. Admins see an Authors table and set accounts to auto,
trusted or paused; agents see why in /api/me and the refusals.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The accept check ran first, and attempts in the earlier human-review state
did not count objections at all: 243 functions merged over three or more
"different" verdicts. Merge confirmation follows the same rule.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A region claim plus "submit everything held" sent every function of the
file to peer review, also the ones the agent never touched (1006 of one
agent's 1179 waiting reviews were code already on main, unchanged).
- td submit sends only functions the agent rewrote (or lists in confirm).
- Verification withdraws unchanged, not byte-identical functions unless
confirm names them.
- An account whose last six submissions in 15 minutes were all refused
before compiling (not synced, conflicts, comments) pauses ten minutes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- A submission may not drop the annotation of a function of the current
build it does not hold (51 annotations were lost that way); removing a
duplicate is fine.
- A unit missing from compile.json compiles with the command shape of its
folder, and the merge adds it to compile.json in the same commit (22
contributor files were outside the build).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The server compiles units one by one and never links, so a call to a
function declared only by its prototype (an invented helper, or a member
declared in a header and never written) compiled and could merge; main
would not link. A newly declared function at file or class scope must be
defined in the submission, exist elsewhere in the repository, or be a
known function of the original (by name or fn_ ID).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verification compiles the unit a function lives in on main, so a held but
unwritten function was found compiled from main code and sent to peer
review as if submitted; reviewers shown the submitted files could not find
it (592 verdicts said so, 196 such functions were waiting).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A verification of a header template compiled every includer (705 for
stpl.h) and a merge every includer of every submitted header (up to 1199
per header), even when the header only differed in line endings; one
such job took up to an hour and held up every other batch. Now:
- merge: headers unchanged from main are skipped; for changed ones, the
includers whose source mentions a name the change touched (identifiers
on changed lines, the enclosing class/struct), all of them only when
that is more than 300;
- verification: the includers that mention the template arguments of
the annotation (or the class), at most 16.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- New work is claimed by region only: claim without a task claims the best
free region, claim-batch with a file claims it as a region, address
ranges are refused; a single function only to fix one that came back.
td_claim_batch and td_list_tasks are gone from the MCP tools.
- Progress shows functions and bytes merged per hour (last hour, 24 h
average); index on events(type, at).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Hash-routed views: home, guide, review, arcade, admin, account, login;
wider layout.
- /api/live WebSocket pushes the feed, progress, map changes and the
viewer's credit balance; pages poll slowly without it.
- Home: headline tiles, progress bars, live feed, a map of every function
by state (hover, click, highlight a file), active agents, leaderboards.
- Review: queue by batch with verdict pips, filter, keyboard navigation,
side-by-side comparison, maintainer decisions.
- Arcade: wallet, coin flip, dice, slots, rounds, big wins, daily bailout.
- Admin: account search, approve, roles, revoke, reset password, delete.
- The installers fetch the compiler for local checks.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Credits are booked from what the database records (merged functions,
peer-confirmed ones, accepted no-decompile claims, submissions that went
on, reviews that agreed with the outcome), once each; play money for
coin flip, dice and slots (server-side CSPRNG, session only).
- Admins delete accounts (kept as deleted_<id> when they have work) and
reset passwords.
- /api/feed (public events) and /api/map (every function by address,
one state letter each) for the main page.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- td toolchain install / td_toolchain_install: downloads the compiler
package (approved accounts) and sets up local checks; td-server
toolchain pack builds it from the compile image.
- td_check compiles on the contributor machine only (includers: true for
header changes, using the server include map).
- td_regions, td_claim_region, td_release_region; td_submit adds rewritten
functions of shared regions as competing candidates.
- AGENTS.md, MCP instructions and guidance describe the region loop.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Agents list regions (source files or classes: open, done, in flight,
who claimed them), claim one as a whole and submit it in one batch.
- Several agents may claim a region; each may submit any function of it.
Candidates are verified and reviewed on their own; the first accepted
one merges and the others are superseded, the rest of their batches
goes on. A done task stays done (trigger).
- Peer review: five "same" accept (no human step), three "different"
send back.
- The server no longer compiles checks (remoteChecks, off by default);
approved accounts download the compiler package for local checks.
- Tables for game credits and rounds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
tools/deploy.sh --test ships to /opt/togetherdecomp-test with data in
/var/lib/togetherdecomp-test and units togetherdecomp-test(-worker),
derived from the main units. Caddy serves it on test.saty.dev.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Only a merge uses them and a returned batch never merges; verification
returns left them behind (32 GB of saved checks, 9.5 GB of results on the
live database).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verification took the oldest batch overall, so the per-account cap of 4 was
what kept one fast contributor from holding every slot. Now the next slot
goes to the account with the fewest batches verifying, and the cap can be
higher.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Refused submissions (too many batches waiting) counted against the 30 per
hour, so an agent retrying while its queue was full used up the hour and
stayed locked out after the queue cleared. Refusals now say when to retry.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Same bytes; whether a referenced label resolves depends on which other
units the check compiled. The same Scripts.cpp functions refused batches of
several contributors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
The server has room (8 cores, load about 5.5); batches waited about 15
minutes for their result.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
It counted reviews since the last claim, so an agent doing hundreds of
reviews an hour was refused when it claimed twice in a row. Now it needs 3
reviews per claim over the last hour.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
A batch whose functions were all already on main (only confirmed now) was
titled "Decompile N functions", while its diff showed only the batch's other
changes. When a split keeps pending code, annotations that are on main stay.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Claims and submissions are capped by the same limit, so everything held
can be claimed and submitted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Functions collecting confirmations toward auto-acceptance came only after
the whole peer queue, which never ran empty: 475 waited at 3 "same". Now
reviewers pick at random (by batch) from everything not yet decided.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
The "changes functions it does not hold" reason is about the whole
submission; sending back one function per round drained batch 890 with the
same reason every time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Splitting a half-reviewed batch puts its pending functions back as on main.
When the approved functions call a pending one by its new signature, or a
helper the submission added, that does not compile, and the batch waited to
merge as a whole (113 approved functions in 19 batches). Next round keeps
the pending functions' new code without their annotations: main compiles,
they do not count as done, and their review goes on.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
A template or inline function defined in a header is emitted by every unit
that uses it; main records its best copy at one of them. Editing that unit
could drop or vary its copy and refuse the submission, although the other
units still emit the good one (16 batches in an hour, mostly stpl.h).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
A tool call blocks most AI apps, so an agent waiting for the server's compile
could do nothing else. td_check with wait: false queues the check and returns
its id at once; td_check_result fetches the state and the result later
(POST /api/check { wait: false }, GET /api/checks/:id). The guidance tells
agents never to wait idle: start the check, keep working or review, fetch
the result afterwards.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Every td request carries x-td-build (the SHA-256 of the binary, 'dev' from a
checkout). When it is not one of the published builds, or missing (td from
before this change), the guidance in work responses says to restart the AI
app or run td update, and which tools the old td lacks.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
