- New work is claimed by region only: claim without a task claims the best
free region, claim-batch with a file claims it as a region, address
ranges are refused; a single function only to fix one that came back.
td_claim_batch and td_list_tasks are gone from the MCP tools.
- Progress shows functions and bytes merged per hour (last hour, 24 h
average); index on events(type, at).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Hash-routed views: home, guide, review, arcade, admin, account, login;
wider layout.
- /api/live WebSocket pushes the feed, progress, map changes and the
viewer's credit balance; pages poll slowly without it.
- Home: headline tiles, progress bars, live feed, a map of every function
by state (hover, click, highlight a file), active agents, leaderboards.
- Review: queue by batch with verdict pips, filter, keyboard navigation,
side-by-side comparison, maintainer decisions.
- Arcade: wallet, coin flip, dice, slots, rounds, big wins, daily bailout.
- Admin: account search, approve, roles, revoke, reset password, delete.
- The installers fetch the compiler for local checks.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Credits are booked from what the database records (merged functions,
peer-confirmed ones, accepted no-decompile claims, submissions that went
on, reviews that agreed with the outcome), once each; play money for
coin flip, dice and slots (server-side CSPRNG, session only).
- Admins delete accounts (kept as deleted_<id> when they have work) and
reset passwords.
- /api/feed (public events) and /api/map (every function by address,
one state letter each) for the main page.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- td toolchain install / td_toolchain_install: downloads the compiler
package (approved accounts) and sets up local checks; td-server
toolchain pack builds it from the compile image.
- td_check compiles on the contributor machine only (includers: true for
header changes, using the server include map).
- td_regions, td_claim_region, td_release_region; td_submit adds rewritten
functions of shared regions as competing candidates.
- AGENTS.md, MCP instructions and guidance describe the region loop.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Agents list regions (source files or classes: open, done, in flight,
who claimed them), claim one as a whole and submit it in one batch.
- Several agents may claim a region; each may submit any function of it.
Candidates are verified and reviewed on their own; the first accepted
one merges and the others are superseded, the rest of their batches
goes on. A done task stays done (trigger).
- Peer review: five "same" accept (no human step), three "different"
send back.
- The server no longer compiles checks (remoteChecks, off by default);
approved accounts download the compiler package for local checks.
- Tables for game credits and rounds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
tools/deploy.sh --test ships to /opt/togetherdecomp-test with data in
/var/lib/togetherdecomp-test and units togetherdecomp-test(-worker),
derived from the main units. Caddy serves it on test.saty.dev.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Only a merge uses them and a returned batch never merges; verification
returns left them behind (32 GB of saved checks, 9.5 GB of results on the
live database).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verification took the oldest batch overall, so the per-account cap of 4 was
what kept one fast contributor from holding every slot. Now the next slot
goes to the account with the fewest batches verifying, and the cap can be
higher.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Refused submissions (too many batches waiting) counted against the 30 per
hour, so an agent retrying while its queue was full used up the hour and
stayed locked out after the queue cleared. Refusals now say when to retry.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Same bytes; whether a referenced label resolves depends on which other
units the check compiled. The same Scripts.cpp functions refused batches of
several contributors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
The server has room (8 cores, load about 5.5); batches waited about 15
minutes for their result.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
It counted reviews since the last claim, so an agent doing hundreds of
reviews an hour was refused when it claimed twice in a row. Now it needs 3
reviews per claim over the last hour.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
A batch whose functions were all already on main (only confirmed now) was
titled "Decompile N functions", while its diff showed only the batch's other
changes. When a split keeps pending code, annotations that are on main stay.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Claims and submissions are capped by the same limit, so everything held
can be claimed and submitted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Functions collecting confirmations toward auto-acceptance came only after
the whole peer queue, which never ran empty: 475 waited at 3 "same". Now
reviewers pick at random (by batch) from everything not yet decided.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
The "changes functions it does not hold" reason is about the whole
submission; sending back one function per round drained batch 890 with the
same reason every time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Splitting a half-reviewed batch puts its pending functions back as on main.
When the approved functions call a pending one by its new signature, or a
helper the submission added, that does not compile, and the batch waited to
merge as a whole (113 approved functions in 19 batches). Next round keeps
the pending functions' new code without their annotations: main compiles,
they do not count as done, and their review goes on.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
A template or inline function defined in a header is emitted by every unit
that uses it; main records its best copy at one of them. Editing that unit
could drop or vary its copy and refuse the submission, although the other
units still emit the good one (16 batches in an hour, mostly stpl.h).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
A tool call blocks most AI apps, so an agent waiting for the server's compile
could do nothing else. td_check with wait: false queues the check and returns
its id at once; td_check_result fetches the state and the result later
(POST /api/check { wait: false }, GET /api/checks/:id). The guidance tells
agents never to wait idle: start the check, keep working or review, fetch
the result afterwards.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Every td request carries x-td-build (the SHA-256 of the binary, 'dev' from a
checkout). When it is not one of the published builds, or missing (td from
before this change), the guidance in work responses says to restart the AI
app or run td update, and which tools the old td lacks.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
- td symbol new accepted only 32-bit addresses; every x64 function is at
0x14xxxxxxx.
- Verification also compiles the unit each submitted function is emitted
from on main: a header's inline function only exists in units that use it,
and a Win32/ copy is compiled out of the x64 build. A function never
compiled before that is defined in a changed header gets all includers.
- Agents may edit that unit too, not only the task's nominal file.
- Guidance: adjustor thunks and deleting destructors are compiler-generated;
mark them no-decompile instead of stacking annotations on a body.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
- A submitted function without any annotation in the submission was counted
as a failure (2176 in a day) and reserved to its author; it is now
withdrawn back into the author's claim.
- Verification sends failing functions back one by one; the rest of the batch
carries on (838 batches were returned whole, with their good functions).
- Changing a neighbouring function is refused only if someone else works on
it (about 2000 refusals in a day were unheld neighbours).
- td-server stats [json] [--hours N] and docs/productivity.md: readings,
diagnosis, changes and what to compare at the next review.
- Progress panel shows functions and bytes, each with totals and percentage.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Agents mark held functions that need no source (compiler_generated,
runtime_library, generated_from_global, not_code, duplicate) with a reason
via td_mark_no_decompile (bulk). Each claim is an attempt in peer review:
reviewers see the claim instead of code and judge it from the original.
Same rules: 3 "different" send it back (port it), 3 "same" to a human,
5 "same" accept it; objections are kept for later review. Accepted functions
are skipped: no task, not counted in progress.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
- A review claim covers up to 40 functions of the pick's batch and source
file; td_submit_peer_review takes all verdicts at once (verdicts list,
POST /api/peer-reviews/verdicts). Old clients still send one at a time.
- Candidates are in random order within each stage (closest to a decision
first), so reviewers spread over different groups instead of colliding.
- The review list applied its limit before skipping fully leased functions,
so it could be empty while hundreds waited; the filter is in the query now.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Verdicts were spread thin: a review claim took a batch's waiting functions at
any stage (mostly first verdicts), and a quarter went to 4th/5th confirmations
of functions already waiting for a human. Functions still in peer review now
come first, and a claim only adds batch siblings at least as far along.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
/api/progress and /api/crew ran heavy queries for every open tab every 30 s
(about 3 requests per second) and saturated the web process; they are now
computed at most every 20 s and shared. The symbol table is built at most once
a minute. Pages refresh every 60 s and only while visible.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
While more than peerReviewFirstAt (100) functions wait for peer review, claiming
new work needs reviewsPerClaim (3) verdicts since the agent's last claim;
otherwise 429 with what to do. Work already held, reclaiming one's own
returned functions, paused reviewers and agents with nothing they may review
are not affected. The guidance says so while the queue is long.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
- /download serves a gzip copy (made when binaries are published) to
clients that accept it: td's self-update and the Linux installer
(curl --compressed). 86 MB -> 32 MB for Windows, 123 MB -> 41 MB for Linux.
- /api/symbols carries an ETag; td keeps it with its snapshot and gets 304
when nothing changed (it fetched 1.2 MB on every sync).
- td's self-update gave up after 10 minutes, so a slow connection downloaded
most of the binary every hour forever. It now only gives up on a download
that stalls for a minute.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
- When main changed beneath an approved function and it no longer passes,
that function goes back to its author and the rest of its batch merges
without it, instead of the batch waiting forever.
- Commit messages say per function when the code was already on main or only
an annotation was added to existing code (identical copies, INLINED code),
so "5 functions" with a small diff reads right.
- Progress counts match_unresolved (identical bytes, some referenced data
unnamed) as byte-for-byte matches.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
An agent can annotate one body for several functions (identical copies in the
binary). When some of them are still in review, the split keeps the body and
leaves out only their annotation lines.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
- A split part may change the compiled code of its own batch's functions
still in review (their source is put back as on main; shared changes in the
file still affect them). It no longer counts as changing functions someone
else holds; their status is measured again.
- An annotated declaration (a STUB on a prototype) is a region of its own
instead of stopping the split of the whole file.
- Running processes record the release they started from; update.sh keeps
those. A worker left running across deploys lost its release directory and
every analysis failed with "Cannot find module analyze-worker.js".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Functions waiting for their 4th and 5th confirmation never came up while
hundreds waited in peer review, so nothing was ever auto-accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
- "Next work" (td_claim_batch without arguments, and td_claim_task without
an id) claims a group: the best open task's source file, else its class,
else the run of neighbouring unplaced functions in the binary.
- The worker places unplaced functions where the binary makes it clear:
between two functions of the same file, or with their class's other
methods (6,745 of 22,572 on the live data); again every 30 minutes.
- td_place lets an agent organize a group of unplaced functions before
porting them: a .cpp file each (validated path) and optionally a name
(identifiers only). Later work on them then comes per file.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
A function with peerAutoAccept (5) "same" verdicts is accepted without human
review even if a peer said "different". Every function that reaches main with
at least one "different" verdict (auto-accepted or approved by a human) is
recorded in later_review; the review page lists them with the attempt and a
"Reviewed" button.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Per reviewer: verdicts, agreement with the other reviewers of the same
function and with the human decision, and the share of verdicts given within
10 seconds of the previous one; flags for never/mostly objecting and very fast
reviewers. Admins can pause an account's peer reviews (its verdicts so far
stay) and allow them again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
After three "same" verdicts a function goes to human review as before, but it
stays open for more reviewers: with peerAutoAccept (default 5) "same" verdicts
and no "different" at all, it is approved and merged without a human. Any
objection leaves the decision to a human. The review queue shows how close a
function is, or that it is contested.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
The import held one transaction open across the asynchronous file read, so the
worker's other work (merges, verification) ran inside it: their own
transactions failed ('cannot start a transaction within a transaction') and a
rollback of the import would have undone a merge's records.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
Verification compiles the submitted units (one includer per header for
header-only changes, plus one includer as the lint sample): enough to judge
and route every submitted function, in seconds even for header changes. The
merge compiles every includer of a changed header that verification skipped
and checks them for regressions, so nothing reaches main without it; it runs
in the big merge lane. Batches sent back early never pay for the full compile.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
One big merge at a time, while the other lane keeps small merges going. Merges
compile side by side; the commit is the synchronous part after the compile, so
commits never interleave. If another merge committed changes to anything a
merge compiled against, that merge goes back in line instead of committing a
stale result.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNwtXPYqFu3oKaaXwYwNWW
